If having a good will means having a good moral character, as several commentators have persuasively argued, Bader's interpretation does not capture Kant's view.
In this essay, I will contrast and compare virtue ethics to utilitarianism, ethical egoism, and Kantianism to demonstrate these differences. In their introduction the editors contrast the "structureless" version of the highest good at play in consequentialist theories with the more complex Aristotelian and Kantian conceptions of the highest good as "the source or condition of the goodness of other goods" 1.
Aufderheide presents a remedial view of ethical virtue, claiming that virtuous action "is chosen to set things right" Here Aristotle makes a distinction between praiseworthy and honorable things, explaining that virtue is praiseworthy and happiness is honorable.
She considers the inner voice's call for proportionality of happiness and virtue "a central fact of moral experience, one to be respected by any account of the highest good," but she questions whether the postulation of God is necessary for the proper acknowledgment of this call Kantian Ethics Essay - Imagine being faced with an important decision that affects a group of people.
The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. The crux of the disagreement between these two philosophers is that they both disagree on the methods by which we should derive moral rules and guidelines.